Volume 13 - Vol.13, (Special Issue)
irje 2018, 13 - Vol.13, (Special Issue): 110-121 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Haghdoost A, Emami M, Hossienpour M, Rakhshani F, Mehrolhasani M. Presenting A Model for Ranking Health Deputies of Medical Universities . irje 2018; 13 :110-121
URL: http://irje.tums.ac.ir/article-1-5981-en.html
URL: http://irje.tums.ac.ir/article-1-5981-en.html
1- Professor, Research Center for Modeling in Health, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
2- PhD By Research Student in Management Sciences (Health Policy), Health Services Management Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
3- MD MPH, Head of Development Department, Health Deputy of Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
4- Professor, Department of Health Education, Research Center for Health Promotion, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
5- Associate Professor, Health Services Management Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran , mhmhealth@kmu.ac.ir
2- PhD By Research Student in Management Sciences (Health Policy), Health Services Management Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
3- MD MPH, Head of Development Department, Health Deputy of Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
4- Professor, Department of Health Education, Research Center for Health Promotion, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
5- Associate Professor, Health Services Management Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran , mhmhealth@kmu.ac.ir
Abstract: (3521 Views)
Background and Objectives: Promoting health indicators is a key issue in most societies. In this regard, health deputies, through stewardship, monitoring, and coordination, take meassures to promote these indicators. The aim of the present study was to design a model for ranking the performance of the deputies.
Methods: This applied qualitative study was conducted in 2012. The research team included 12 health experts who were selected according to management records and long experience in the health deputy. In this study, a review of the literature and documents was done and then, with the focus group discussions and expert opinions, key indicators were defined.
Results: a model consisting of 9 process criteria (13 general indicators and 15 specific indicators) was identified for ranking of health deputies. The general processes included leadership and management, programs and strategies, resources and partnerships, manpower, and comprehensive information and statistics system And specific processes included primary health care (PHC), family physician (FP), social determinants of health (SDH) and pilot national plans. The range of indicators scores was between 1-8, which were compared with the zero indicator.
Conclusion: The findings showed that the process components and indicators were more effective in determining the status of the health deputies’ performance, and the proposed model is based on the matter. So, it is recommended that the Ministry of Health ranks health deputies every two years to improve process components and criteria of the model based on practical results.
Methods: This applied qualitative study was conducted in 2012. The research team included 12 health experts who were selected according to management records and long experience in the health deputy. In this study, a review of the literature and documents was done and then, with the focus group discussions and expert opinions, key indicators were defined.
Results: a model consisting of 9 process criteria (13 general indicators and 15 specific indicators) was identified for ranking of health deputies. The general processes included leadership and management, programs and strategies, resources and partnerships, manpower, and comprehensive information and statistics system And specific processes included primary health care (PHC), family physician (FP), social determinants of health (SDH) and pilot national plans. The range of indicators scores was between 1-8, which were compared with the zero indicator.
Conclusion: The findings showed that the process components and indicators were more effective in determining the status of the health deputies’ performance, and the proposed model is based on the matter. So, it is recommended that the Ministry of Health ranks health deputies every two years to improve process components and criteria of the model based on practical results.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
General
Received: 2018/07/2 | Accepted: 2018/07/2 | Published: 2018/07/2
Received: 2018/07/2 | Accepted: 2018/07/2 | Published: 2018/07/2
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
